Well, the first thing I have to be up front about with this article is that I was totally overwhelmed as I began reading it! It took me up until about the 5th page before I really understood what was going on!
McEaney states that "The objective of this article is to describe (and, in one version, to illustrate by example) how new web technologies can be applied to assist readers both in integrating content and in maintaining a process focus as they navigate complex expository text. The central concept behind the approach described is that of the learner's “path.” I enjoyed the way he literally put you on a "path" to illustrate the use of them. I found each page to be very clear and focused, which is important when you are talking about assisting students with new web technologies.
I also found it interesting to then go back and use the "traditional hypertext" to look at the same reading in a more typical form. After first feeling frustrated with the path, I realized that I preferred it to the traditional text. As McEneaney stated, when you don't have to focus on choosing where to go on the internet, comprehension becomes much easier! I enjoyed that "path" clearly guided me to what was next.
I also found that the "notes" for each page were helpful. This feature would be fantastic to use if you were discussing a novel in a class. "Sidenotes" are great ways to help clarify information for students and to add ideas to generate new discussions. Again, I must admit that at first I was a little hesitant and confused about the path and the notes, but once you get into the swing of it, it really is quite simple!
What I liked the most about this article, however, was that McEneaney seemed to look deeply into the pros and cons of web related learning. I appreciated his honesty about the internet having some downfalls. The ones that I particularly related to were problems with 1. access to the web, 2. locating relevant and quality material, and 3. lack of structure on the web.
Access to the Web: I always worry about integrating technology into my class because of the rather high number of students who do not have it. However, I was surprised to see that this was not what McEneaney was referring to at all. He feels that there is too much "overaccessibility", where it is too easy for students to move around the internet and lose focus. I can absolutely see that as a major problem......let's be honest, I am guilty of it myself!
Locating Relevant and Quality Material: We all know, as discussed in class on Tuesday, that students will read anything and believe anything, as along as it gives them some type of answer they think they are looking for!
Lack of Structure: Again, lets be honest, this lack of structure, with the overaccessibiltiy factor, can make using the web a MAJOR TIME CONSUMER.....and it is not always time well spent! I can only imagine how much work it must take to keep students on task and focused when they know they have access to so much that they want to explore (that has nothing to do with your class!)
In the end, I do feel that McEneaney believes that the use of the web to help students outweighs the "cons" of the internet. Allowing students to be interactive as they learn can only help them in the long run.
Course homepage
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I have to agree that this article was extremely overwhelming to me as well, especially since the whole purpose was to experience "the path," which I couldn't get to move from the "Navigating the Path-Based Version" page. I had to use the traditional version, which is nothing short of annoying-- it forces you go to back to the page index and choose a new page each time you are finished with one. I think it took away from the whole point of the article, which was to become familiar with the path, and now I don't even really feel like I understand what it is. Besides which, bouncing and flipping back and forth took away from the content-- I don't remember half of what I read now! Honestly, and printed out version on paper would have been more effective than trying to navigate this traditional (a.k.a irritating) version. Grrr that was frustrating...I should have calmed down before I posted.
Courtney---I think you absolutely proved his point: that the benefit of using "paths" helps the reader focus on comprehension and lets you not worry about "going to" the write places. I hope you can access the path version to get a feel for it...it was pretty impressive!
Janet and Courtney,
I am not able to access the path-based text either. After reading your respective posting and comments, I gather that the degree of complication of the article while not being able to experience the path will be counterproductive. Even McEneaney strongly urges people who don't choose the path, to go back and try it after reading another format. Thank you, Janet, for your posting, which at least gives me an idea of what is on it. (Courtney, maybe we'll have the possibility to try it in the lab on Tuesday...)
Ana, Janet, and Courtney,
I couldn't access the "learner's path" version either. I had to use the traditional version and I feel like I didn't "get" McEneaney's point of the whole article either. I printed out pages of the traditional version because I'd lose my place or train of thought in the original text whenever I'd click on another link, but it was more aggravating than helpful.
I selected this article because of the experience McEneaney offers. But any technologically-mediated artifcat that doesn't work as it's supposed to is substantially distorted. Books are more robust. I'm sorry you couldn't all experience the learner's path.
Post a Comment